VCDQuality Forums
Here you can view your subscribed threads, work with private messages and edit your profile and preferences Frequently Asked Questions Search Home  
VCDQuality Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.3.0 VCDQuality Forums > VCDQuality.com > Comments > DVDR > Christmas With The Kranks *NTSC* - DVDRIP - MPTDVD
  Last Thread   Next Thread
Author
Thread Post New Thread    Post A Reply
Doomslayer
May 2003

Registered

Video 10
Audio 10
Movie 6
All Menus there

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 03-19-2005 11:51 AM
Doomslayer is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Doomslayer Click here to Send Doomslayer a Private Message Find more posts by Doomslayer Add Doomslayer to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
omega59
Jul 2003

Senior Member

interlaced.

Last edited by omega59 on 03-19-2005 at 05:37 PM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 03-19-2005 04:49 PM
omega59 is offline Click Here to See the Profile for omega59 Click here to Send omega59 a Private Message Find more posts by omega59 Add omega59 to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
omega59
Jul 2003

Senior Member

i ran it through dvd2avi and here were MY results.


http://images5.theimagehosting.com/clip.5.jpg

can we say interlaced.. and can we say wtf is with that message? lmfao.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 03-19-2005 08:18 PM
omega59 is offline Click Here to See the Profile for omega59 Click here to Send omega59 a Private Message Find more posts by omega59 Add omega59 to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
JoshNya
Jul 2002


Registered

Volume Name CHRISTMAS_WITH_THE_KRANKS
Application id Derrow UDF/ISO Applicat
Implementation id Derrow UDF/ISO Library
Recording Date/Time (mm/dd/yyyy) 3/18/2005 20:41:39

Actually this might be worth it. I ran my tests, the DVD was just stripped of FS vobs with DVDXCopy. Not my preference to strip a movie, but I guess it works. I dont know if it altered any menus or not. But as far as the movie goes it appears to be untouched, french track and foreign subs there too. I didnt see any visual signs of interlacing, that pic in DVD2AVI above will display that for any picture.

I don't like MPT, they owe me about 30-40 gigs of credit. But this DVD looks like a no-brainer.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 03-19-2005 10:25 PM
JoshNya is offline Click Here to See the Profile for JoshNya Click here to Send JoshNya a Private Message Find more posts by JoshNya Add JoshNya to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
hackteck
Jun 2004

Registered

its gotta be 10/10/4 video is untouched original is dvd9 with fs and ws on the disk fs was ripped so there was no encoding needed finally a nice release from mptdvd lol and i agree with you totally i hate them for making me waste credits only to find out their release was dvdshrink or x but props for this release

Last edited by hackteck on 03-20-2005 at 03:57 AM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 03-20-2005 03:54 AM
hackteck is offline Click Here to See the Profile for hackteck Click here to Send hackteck a Private Message Find more posts by hackteck Add hackteck to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
porco556
Jan 2003


Registered

quote:
Originally posted by omega59
i ran it through dvd2avi and here were MY results.


http://images5.theimagehosting.com/clip.5.jpg

can we say interlaced.. and can we say wtf is with that message? lmfao.


A lot of times, stationary credits (no movement) are left interlaced, even on the retails. The video then switches quickly to progressive/film when the actual movie starts. Check the video type on the 2nd VOB and see what it says.

Also, by seeing the interlaced/progressive mix, it's a good indication that the video really is untouched.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 03-20-2005 05:23 AM
porco556 is offline Click Here to See the Profile for porco556 Click here to Send porco556 a Private Message Find more posts by porco556 Add porco556 to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
omega59
Jul 2003

Senior Member

i had checked and still says interlaced.
o'well!

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 03-20-2005 05:52 AM
omega59 is offline Click Here to See the Profile for omega59 Click here to Send omega59 a Private Message Find more posts by omega59 Add omega59 to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
porco556
Jan 2003


Registered

quote:
Originally posted by omega59
i had checked and still says interlaced.
o'well!


That's messed up then... It's rare to see a NTSC retail that's interlaced these days. Dunno. It's on my D/l block since I haven't seen the traditional MPT nuke yet

It is a R3 retail (assuming from the Chinese, Thai, Korean subtitles), but I doubt that would change anything with the encode.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 03-20-2005 06:18 AM
porco556 is offline Click Here to See the Profile for porco556 Click here to Send porco556 a Private Message Find more posts by porco556 Add porco556 to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
willrick
May 2003

Registered

I ran the second VOB trough DVD2AVI, and it's definitly progressive.

it's at least 99% progressive, with a very few interlaced frames. So, video is untouched.

10/10/4 (The book is so much better)

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 03-20-2005 12:27 PM
willrick is offline Click Here to See the Profile for willrick Click here to Send willrick a Private Message Find more posts by willrick Add willrick to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
dlbyrd40
Mar 2005

Registered

video seems fine on my 27 inch screen. I think it is worth rhe d/l.

__________________
-Duncan

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 03-20-2005 05:55 PM
dlbyrd40 is offline Click Here to See the Profile for dlbyrd40 Click here to Send dlbyrd40 a Private Message Find more posts by dlbyrd40 Add dlbyrd40 to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
SHaKiNGBRaVe
Apr 2002


Been around a while

quote:
Originally posted by hackteck
its gotta be 10/10/4 video is untouched original is dvd9 with fs and ws on the disk fs was ripped so there was no encoding needed finally a nice release from mptdvd lol and i agree with you totally i hate them for making me waste credits only to find out their release was dvdshrink or x but props for this release


not to nit pick, but just because it's untouched doesn't make it an automatic 10. dvds from the factory can come with artifacts, etc, that are beyond the group's control. although in this case i agree the video is near perfect, it's not always the case with untouched releases.

9/9/6

__________________
fus j00

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 03-21-2005 10:34 PM
SHaKiNGBRaVe is offline Click Here to See the Profile for SHaKiNGBRaVe Click here to Send SHaKiNGBRaVe a Private Message Find more posts by SHaKiNGBRaVe Add SHaKiNGBRaVe to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
porco556
Jan 2003


Registered

quote:
Originally posted by SHaKiNGBRaVe
not to nit pick, but just because it's untouched doesn't make it an automatic 10. dvds from the factory can come with artifacts, etc, that are beyond the group's control. although in this case i agree the video is near perfect, it's not always the case with untouched releases.

9/9/6


99% of the time, the video score on this site is relative to the retail copy. If the video is untouched, it's perfect compared to the retail (as in best you'll get until HD-DVD or special edition).

If picture quality reviews is what you seek, then there are hundreds of sites with super picky guys that do it for a living and write full length reviews.

Last edited by porco556 on 03-22-2005 at 02:22 AM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 03-22-2005 01:43 AM
porco556 is offline Click Here to See the Profile for porco556 Click here to Send porco556 a Private Message Find more posts by porco556 Add porco556 to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Redemption1980
Jul 2004


Senior Member

quote:
Originally posted by porco556
99% of the time, the video score on this site is relative to the retail copy. If the video is untouched, it's perfect compared to the retail (as in best you'll get until HD-DVD or special edition).

If picture quality reviews is what you seek, then there are hundreds of sites with super picky guys that do it for a living and write full length reviews.



While i agree with what u mean in principle, since we dont have the Retail DVD to compare it to every time, the i think we have to review it on how it looks, not whether its Untouched or not, as we dont know if the NFO is correct or not.

SVCD's and XVID's are judged on the quality of the pic, so if the Retail DVD is poor then they will be even worse, so will a DVDR if it has to be re-encoded, and might get a poor score, even though its no fault of the group.

Ive saw excelent Downsampled DVD's getting a 8 and poor quality Untouched get a 10, even though the downsampled one looked better, I dont think thats a fair system, we shouldn't have to know if it Untouched or not to judge it, and im sure load of people read the NFO, see Untouched, 5.1 and give out 10/10 scores, even though they dont have even a sample.

Rant over

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 03-22-2005 11:25 PM
Redemption1980 is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Redemption1980 Click here to Send Redemption1980 a Private Message Find more posts by Redemption1980 Add Redemption1980 to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
porco556
Jan 2003


Registered

quote:
Originally posted by Redemption1980
While i agree with what u mean in principle, since we dont have the Retail DVD to compare it to every time, the i think we have to review it on how it looks, not whether its Untouched or not, as we dont know if the NFO is correct or not.

SVCD's and XVID's are judged on the quality of the pic, so if the Retail DVD is poor then they will be even worse, so will a DVDR if it has to be re-encoded, and might get a poor score, even though its no fault of the group.

Ive saw excelent Downsampled DVD's getting a 8 and poor quality Untouched get a 10, even though the downsampled one looked better, I dont think thats a fair system, we shouldn't have to know if it Untouched or not to judge it, and im sure load of people read the NFO, see Untouched, 5.1 and give out 10/10 scores, even though they dont have even a sample.

Rant over



Hehe... You are also correct also in principle. Good point too when you mention we don't have the retail to compare to. And even if we did, only a very small select few would actually pay money to rent it when they have the "rip" already. And the ironic part is, when a movie is re-encoded, I gripe on flaws that I find out later are in the retail too (ie: The Incredibles for example).

I guess this is the 4th time it has come up in this forum (different threads, different people... can't remember them off hand)... Never any real solutions either. I guess everyone should just continue what they're doing I actually may start griping on these untouched videos a bit more (especially since I heard Spanglish ain't too hot for untouched, and Christmas with the Kranks' colors looked washed out too [like a early 90's movie]).

8/10 Video

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 03-23-2005 12:01 AM
porco556 is offline Click Here to See the Profile for porco556 Click here to Send porco556 a Private Message Find more posts by porco556 Add porco556 to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:33 AM. Post New Thread    Post A Reply
  Last Thread   Next Thread
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread

Rate This Thread:

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is OFF
 

< Contact Us - www.vcdhq.com >

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.