olddirtyogre
Jun 2005
Senior Member
|
quote: Originally posted by archyontop
Ummm... yeah... that's what most real screeners do. And the "blur" in the top right hand corner is a watermark/serial number. They cover it up so they don't get busted.
Video: 8.
Audio: 8.
Movie: 5.
THE REASON FOR THE CGI, IS BECAUSE WHEN SOME STUDIOS "RELEASE" SCREENERS, SOME CGI SCREENS AREN'T FULLY RENDERED, SO WHAT YOU SEE IS AN QUICK, HALF DONE CGI SCENE... I WOULD HOLD IT AGAINST THE MOVIE
On your note of the CGI being purposly downgraded, I would have to say you're wrong. The man who directed this movie also directed a great movie byt the name of Equillibrium, and since seeing Equillibrium I have somewhat followed his recent projects, Ultra Violet being one of them. The fact is the studio cut his budget before he was done making the movie and tore the shit out of it in the editing room. The CGI you see in this screener is in fact what was in theaters, it really is crap. The director himself was terribly upset about how his film turned out because the studio pretty much kicked him in the nuts and took away his project for no reason. What you see in this movie is pretty much what the studio wanted, not what the director wanted. But I have heard rumors that the director was able to get his hand back into his project with some more money to fix the effects and create a real "directors cut" of this flick, I just hope this rumor is true because this film had a lot of potential.
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|