True or not true is the question!!!!!!


http://uk.movies.yahoo.com/blog/art...rs-leaked/.html

__________________
I was never caught!

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

mite be worth a punt at the bookies, before they get wind of it?

__________________
*Meet the rest of the VCDQ Crew, HERE *

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Me wonders if they may change the outcome of nominations if it is true, i expect they know by now though art bookies are always quick when it comes to ££££

I do reckon Best Supporting Actor: Heath Ledger though alive or dead was an amazing performance and should get it, but that's just my opinion

__________________
I was never caught!

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

All the winners in this supposed "leak" were the odds on favourites anyway. For example I think Slumdog was around 8-1 on to win Best Picture.....and that was BEFORE this latest piece of bullshit disguised as news.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Heath Ledgers a lock

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by Dutch
All the winners in this supposed "leak" were the odds on favourites anyway. For example I think Slumdog was around 8-1 on to win Best Picture.....and that was BEFORE this latest piece of bullshit disguised as news.

---

__________________

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Amy Adams is not a favourite, down as 7-1 against last I checked.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Best Motion Picture of the Year
Slumdog Millionaire (2008): Christian Colson

Best Performance by an Actor in a Leading Role
Sean Penn for Milk (2009)

Best Performance by an Actress in a Leading Role
Kate Winslet for The Reader (2008)

Best Performance by an Actor in a Supporting Role
Heath Ledger for The Dark Knight (2008)

Best Performance by an Actress in a Supporting Role
Penelope Cruz for Vicky Cristina Barcelona (2009)

Best Achievement in Directing
Danny Boyle for Slumdog Millionaire (2008)

__________________
I was never caught!

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

slumdog wasnt worth half the awards it got...fuk sake over rated shit...it was decent but the acting sucked balls..

pitt should have won somethin for button

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by sim-card
pitt should have won somethin for button

---

__________________
Statistically... 9 out of 10 people actually enjoy gang rape.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Benjamin Button was the only award contender I have the slightest interest in seeing.

I've never understood the mentality which insists "I wasn't interested in a certain movie before but now a bunch of geriatric cases in Hollywood have voted it eight awards I'm obliged to watch it".

Last edited by ntscuser on 02-23-2009 at 09:15 PM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Benjamin Button was disappointing. Nicely done, great make-up, nice costumes, well acted...blah...blah...

But would you really watch it again?

And for a Fincher/Pitt combo...Se7en...Fight Club...it's not in the same universe let alone the same planet as those! (Maybe unfair criticism, it's not a failing of Button, just an over-expectant hope of more brilliance.) But did we really need to see Gump with Pitt replacing Hanks?

I saw Slumdog twice within a week. And I would probably watch it again if it happened to be somewhere I was at. It's an excellent combination of audio + visual, a far better use of sound (and soundtrack) than the majority of movies ever make. It's fresh, it's in your face, it makes you pay attention.

__________________

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged