lo.pro
Mar 2002
Senior Member
|
quote:
Originally posted by firefighter
Well , i commented on quality - now im gonna comment on sheep baaaaaah :p
Seeing iMPERIAL's movie getting nuked *odd* places for reason: not.needed
Now lets look at the facts - PROPER usually means better right? Better quality , Better AR , Better Sound ..... among other things.
TCFs Copy - colors were washed , the frames were screwed, the picture was overall watchable but not nice. The Sound ... sounded a bit mic'ish and got bad at times during the movie.
iMPERIALs Copy - Colors were ok , Perfectly cropped , nice & clear , much better picture. The Sound ... resembles TCF's copy wont know if it gets good or bad till i watch the complete movie but sounds ok ... so far.
Now if the sound resembled each other - the frames were better on iMPERIALs , and the picture was much much better as it is .... sounds like a valid proper to me.
Now lets look back in Time ... ahhh a movie comes to mind - Hellboy! BAHA , MPT , Centropy all clearly *same sources* (unlike this movie - The Punisher ), what was the difference in them. Better Picture , Better Sound , Better Encoding. Wow Centropy didnt get nuked.
Which brings me to the point: (thinking to an nfo from BAHA 2 days ago SM3-VOB.NF0.nfo) Quote reason #3: "the scene still hates new groups"
I hate to say it but i will , Had this said -Centropy , -TCR on it or had iMPERIAL not propered "-TCF", they mighta stood a chance everywhere. Instead nukers love to hate new grps and even though this is clearly a much better copy then TCF - nuke it for not needed? pffff
No im not with iMPERIAL release grp. Im just tired of all the sheep nukers out there who need to go back to 10mb's.
this isn't exactly true. sites need not (and should not) accept a proper simply because it's 'better'.
any group could take way more time & make a release better and thereby lose a race. but sites should nuke any 'proper' which is released unless they have previously nuked the release being propered, or unless the nfo for the proper brings up a previously unrecognized problem with the original release.
you are wrong in assuming that 'PROPER' means 'better'. PROPER means "the previous release was nukable, this one isn't". (for instance, you said "proper means better AR"... but AR isn't "better", it's either right or it isn't. bad AR is nukable, and justifies a PROPER.) if a site thinks that a release has poor quality, they can nuke it for poor quality, and wait for a PROPER. but just accepting every release that comes along until a better one is released makes for a ton of releases of every flick. also it's not fair to the group that released the original version, that was accepted, to be nuked 1x days later for quality, nor is it fair to the couriers who raced the original. if a site decides that a release is good enough not to be nuked, then it should nuke all future releases in that category, unless a PROPER is released with something in the nfo that identifies a nukeworthy problem with the previous release that went unnoticed.
the correct label for a release that is thought to have better quality than a previous, unnuked release is iNTERNAL.
__________________
This perceived misuse of Internet resources caused former Dutch education minister Loek Hermans to comment: "It would be nice if the students at Twente University would use their fast connections for information and education purposes, instead of downloading huge amounts of porn."
____________________________________ knowing is the easy part _____________
.
Last edited by lo.pro on 04-22-2004 at 11:19 PM
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
04-22-2004 07:45 AM
Absolutely no need for a NUKE.. Grow up PPL. If u wanna see this rls.. get this one.. IF not, stop complaining. Mega Props to Imperial for this awesome proper
