JoshNya
Jul 2002
Registered
|
quote:
Originally posted by bird
How can you say less fps gives better quality? Imagine watching a movie at 1 frame per second, oh yes, wouldnt that give us the sweetest quality ever. I wanna buy 1fps movies today.
Yes 1fps would look better then 25fps per frame, if compressed, but it wouldnt play that smooth.
Ok imagine there was no compression, straight uncompressed avi format. Sure bigger pic and more FPS would be the best. Why? cause its from a pure source. But you would need about 500 gigs per cd and a supercomputer to play it.
Now compression comes in. We want the least amount of frames to compress right? Less means (more bitrate) more quality per frame. And for size? Smaller means better picture. Why? Less pixels means More bitrate per pixle.
ie: BitRate / FrameRate
2000k/25 = 80k per frame
2000k/23.976 = 83.4k per frame
2000k/1 = 2000k per frame
more bitrate perframe = better picture
Heres a little compression 101 for yaz. You guys can flame all ya want. But this is the truth. Deal with it.
PAL will never be sold in region 1, but NTSC is sold worldwide.
And... as far as the history goes, YES the USA came out with 30fps TVs (and still are) where overseas wanted better at 25fps TVs, but theaters run 23.976 (even better), and that why we use pulldown to display them on USA TVs.
Last edited by JoshNya on 04-29-2003 at 11:18 PM
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
04-29-2003 03:39 PM
