cant wait to get ahold of this for the kids.

cheers,
Arch

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

I dont care if it is a rencode nice release vigilante.
that 2 nice releases 2day keep it up.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

well i guess the new noob trend is to go into threads and cry reencode.. fuck of biatches you gots no clue.. like the one fucker in the spiderman thread that suggested teg colored in the black and white scenes

__________________

"Nothing says OBEY ME like a severed head on a fence post,"

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

this version looks like the centropy release of a screener but im gonna stick with centropy's rls

by the way pretty good!!!

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

CTP's had a washed out look to some parts, this version has the right color scheme.

And will you guys stop talking about sucking cocks and act abit more manly!

Every thread I enter, its like walking into a fags convention!

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

I thought this was forum for discussing the quality of releases not for a bunch of idiots using their street slang crap. Go take your shitty posts to isonews' movie forum.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

This looks pretty good guys, keep up the good work. and btw i only watched this movie cuz pamela anderson was in it

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by TGD
Some of ya guys are just little morons that cant appreciate a free movie. If you dont like the fucker then go rls your own shit you fucking bitches.......geezus, give these people some credit for taking the time on rls'n the flicks.

---

Last edited by reverend on 07-19-2002 at 09:35 AM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

I don't think it's a reencode, it is labeled as a screener.. So I doubt it is a reencode of CTP's version.

---

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by brr8760
Oh, okay. Guess that settles it.

---

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by The Ironduke
CTP's had a washed out look to some parts, this version has the right color scheme.

And will you guys stop talking about sucking cocks and act abit more manly!

Every thread I enter, its like walking into a fags convention!

---

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Looks fine to me. Not sure about the source, but to be honest i don't really care, it's Scooby Doo.

BTW, has anyone noticed that the girl who plays Velma has got massive tits?

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

its ok

- im not a man of many words -

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

well ... i guess some of us aren't that smart. First ctp rls is a TS and this rls is a scr.. ctp takes out the best quality (props) for a TS.. for all of you pplz who say.. omg i gave my ctp copy away for this scr.. it's pretty obvious it would be less brighter than ctp.. well just remember it's a scr.. usually s-vhs tapes. i guess some of us (non-me) are newbie's when it comes to comparing quality on two totally different sources (movie).

ANTY..

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

wanna tell if its a re-encode? look to see if it changes aspect ratio all the time. in the scene where they show the plane the widescreen bars are HUGE and normaly they arent.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

this movie sux ass nobody should even waste there time on it one of the worst movies ive ever seen besides not another teen movie and kung pow

__________________

quote:

---

Originally posted by deftones6


How are you rating the video and audio without actually having the movie????

---

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by killfxp
This looks pretty good guys, keep up the good work. and btw i only watched this movie cuz pamela anderson was in it

---

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Someone said to tell if this is a screener look to see if the widescreen bars appear at the CGI scenes, well if this is a re-encode they could have easily cropped the image down to its true 16:9 aspect (which i did myself, with my copy) so that idea can be threw out the window. I have'nt got this yet but to tell if it is a real screener, (this works with most releases claiming to be screeners, which everyone claims are re-encodes) just look at the credits, if there are more credits on the end than the previous release then it is not a re-encode cause where did they get the extra credits from.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

screeners are S-vhs tapes.. hmm.. i dont think so.. unless they arent original copies... S-vhs is used mainly for television and video editing.. screeners come packaged up just like if it were a movie you bought

__________________

"Nothing says OBEY ME like a severed head on a fence post,"

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

WiKKeSH: i sure do have alot of time on my hands

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged