grabbed the sample.the picture apart from being dark has good colours and definition not too grainy.sound is clean enough to watch but extreemly hollow maybe running sound through hifi and equilizer might beef it up abit.subtitles are not too annoying seen a lot of worse cams posted . 6/4/* will have to grab it for now.

update watching at minute if you turn your brilliance up slightly picture quite ok .hollow sound not too anoying the few minutes of blur in the early part of cd1 is dissapointing but brief.

Last edited by memoman on 05-04-2003 at 03:09 PM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

i think this rel sucks pictúre 4 sound 4 early ts sucks like must other Ts do ....


i dont mind the sub but i mind the sound it makes you crazy.. and so the picture

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by torxxx
AWESOME PRE! Good job esoteric

---

__________________
Flamers No Point Its All FREE Just Stick 2 What Yur Good At Sweet FA

Those Who Flame Will Be Flamed By Others (HehE)

Last edited by DX-WWE on 05-04-2003 at 11:19 PM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Damn pic looks good for a frigin pre, if ctp released the same exact release people would be rating this 8+, ah well. whatever, no like any of the big budget movies this summer will be worth watching home with 4 or 5 people, all should be watched with a full theatre

__________________

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Sound is bad. Why can't groups just label honestly? Telesync SHOULD be direct audio source and this blatantly isn't. Video is average, it isn't anything special but considering the fact this is an early release, this aint bad. Fact is, however, as with LOTR, there's likely to be 101 releases of this (proper after proper).

This would be a good release for any other film, however, with blockbuster films people expect quality and what's "average" for any other film just isn't good enough for the major releases.

I hope that post makes sense, cos I've just been to see this film in the theater followed by several J.D and cokes!

6/3/9

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

this release is very good, i can't believe that it is from esoteric. the quality is great and the sound isnt horrible.

8/7/? have not watched it yet

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Just watched this sucker. The video wasn't too bad. it was pretty clear just a little pixalated during some action scenes. not too bad though. the audio is horrible. it sounds like i'm in a Hall or a Tunnel.
sound's like they recorded the sound outside the theatre. gotta love the subtitles though! :-D

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by DX-WWE


It Aint PRE? Is It
Maybe Where U Are But This Came Out In The UK 2Day
DaMM The World Of Movies Dont Run The USA's Cinema ??
Think Before u Post

BtW It Aint Bad Release I Give It
6/4/? I Am Going 2 See It 2morrow @ The Cinema I Will Rate The Film Then

---

For most of the people I am willing to bet, it is a pre for them. I know there are quite a few people from other countries, but still are a bunch of people it is pre for. And BTW, Have fun with teh matrix.
USA 15 May 2003
UK 23 May 2003
As well as most movies, and... OUCH! http://us.imdb.com/ReleaseDates?0315327

I didn't really love this movie. I guess its a decent movie if you are really into this sort of movie, but I didn't see anything that impressive that makes this movie great. It is fun to watch and entertaining, but not a great movie. I think it is worth seeing in theaters still, but not one of those movies you cherish as a great movie in your collection. It isn't one of those movies you can say, "Damn... This movie is a great movie!" such as a classic like Indiana Jones. I must admit, better than some crap Hollywood has given us! 7/10

Last edited by Rep- on 05-02-2003 at 01:54 AM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

NICE PIC !!! SOUND NOT TOO BAD ! GO'S BLURRY FOR ABOUT 5MINS , 10MINS INTO THE FILM , BUT FINE AFTER THAT

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Just downloaded it, its just like the recent spate of silver cam releases...

damn ESOTERIC....MISLABEL!!! again....can't they just label it properly....a waste of my time downloading this crap...

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

It's ok...for a cam.
A little dark.
The sound is kinda annoying.

Downloaded it but I'll wait with watching it until tomorrow night...some better release will hopefully pop up before then..


6 / 3 / ?

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

7/6/going to watch it tommorow

Seems very watchable, sound is hollow but not bad, video is better then what I expected. Still seems a bit dark in some parts.

Good release.

Edit: has to be a cam, you can hear people in the background sometimes.

Last edited by A1ex on 05-02-2003 at 05:40 PM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Well from viewing the sample, I can say the pic is definitely watchable. Unfortunately the sound is very "tinny" and is kinda hard to make out.

I'd wait til something better comes along.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

The first 5 minutes are out of focus then it clears up, hollow sound but not bad for a Cam definately not TS in my book 6/5/8 video a little dark at time some pixelation, hollow sound. Great flick.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

I'm usualy not very inpressed but by the sample this looks to be a very good copy. Been waiting long to see this one and now I get lucky and get a good copy. Not the best i've seen but great for an early release. 8/7/? <-- But hopefully a 10..

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Audio isn't that bad, it has a cam sound (lacking bass & a bit 'echo-ish'), but at least its clear, and youre not stuggling to understand words. (echo-ish as in hollow-sounding)
And the video is good, except the 5min blurry part, it seems pretty stable and straight/centered, not too pixelated in the high motion scenes, seems a little dark.
This isnt a bad release at all, I wouldnt say its kick-ass though either. I didn't really like X-Men that much (I watched the subbed cam of that when it was in theatres, glad I saved my $9) so this release is good enough for me, if it were Matrix2, or SW ep3, or LOTR3, and this quality, I wouldnt get it, but hey, its only X2!
Vid:7 Aud:5

Last edited by dopeuser8 on 05-02-2003 at 07:43 AM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Watched cd1 so far,

And by Cam Standards
8/7/-

I personally think it is very well watchable, video is perfectly centered, and only a few times did I notice it moving (which was only slight, and could only really be noticed by the sound.)

For a cam, the audio is quite good. No laughing or whatnot, just the general theater hallow-ness, but very much listenable.

Movie is pretty good thus far too. Gonna go watch the rest of it now.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

If you want to see this film and a lot of you seem to want to. I would sugest going to the cinema I went last night and its worth the 5 pounds.

They have those messages up now warning about recording equipment.lol very amusing. oh err 4/2/8 from the sample

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Someone mentioned this one is missing some scenes? Is this true?

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Well, I'm in England so it'll be nice to see it before most of my mates, I've currently got 3hrs left of the download so I can't wait to see it.

I'll be putting it on my Sony Wega Widescreen TV so hopefully that'll help a bit, plus I can edit all the audio and I might even re wire my Stereo a bit so I can use the graphic to mix things up a bit. I'm just hoping it's watchable.

I'll edit my post when I've seen it with a rating.


EDIT: I just saw the movie and I'd give it 6.5 for picture, 6 for sound (sound was fine for me, I didn't get the problems some of you did, and no people laughing) and I'd give the film an 8.

The film does cut off in places which sucks and the end cuts off, but hey, not bad overall.

Last edited by on 05-02-2003 at 03:19 PM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged