one word: why?

:: edit - one word. banned. -M$

Last edited by Mystic Slippe on 06-30-2003 at 08:42 PM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

This is not needed at all.....even if it were an extremely good TS. But, this is not that.....horrible video + sound


4/5/1


::Edit:: The NFO is funny...."some DVD players can't play SVCD so we thought we might as well release this"....as if that is a good reason to release a crappy vcd. joe vcd user would be better off re-encoding the ctp release ;/

Last edited by Spiv2 on 06-30-2003 at 08:45 PM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by jby
one word: why?

:: edit - one word. banned. -M$

---

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

ctp released the best ts...no need for another ts on the scene, but whatever floats your boat. props though for the best ts VCD.
7/6.5/...
-jmur

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by jby
one word: why?

:: edit - one word. banned. -M$

---

__________________
Am I the only one missing the .rar file from the repack?

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

yes ctp did a good job of this rls no need to rls another one but w/e
4/5/7

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by bryehn
better than the other vcds (even the WP) judging from sample, anyways, but i'll stick with the svcd till retail...not a fan of this movie at all...

6/6/3

---

The workprint is perfect, will beat any of the current telesyncs To be totaly honest a telesync is not needed at all, who cares about the odd gfx glitch? I cant stand the quality of any telesync even most of ctps :/

This release is not needed, standard silver quality. Like other groups do with releases such as this ..."THEY INTERNAL!!!" Although under proper rules these can not be duped, imagine if all groups followed this logic, we would be getting VCD DVDRips with the same reasons, perfect SVCD telesyncs would be re-released (probally re-encoded) with the same reason.

5/6/8

Last edited by on 06-30-2003 at 09:12 PM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Im guessing people will nuke this for being a dupe, when we all know if these were released in the other order, ViM then CTP, CTP wouldnt have got nuked...I know its been said alot and i just said it again, but personally, i always nuke ctp for Dupes

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

release is a decent TS, i have downloaded anything besides the workprint, didnt like the movie and wont waste my time till retail. but a fair TS none the less if you want a vcd encode

:: Stop the flaming, please. -K::

Last edited by kalvaitis007 on 06-30-2003 at 10:00 PM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Hi. Can someone please tell me how to check if my movies are PAL or NTSC? Is there a program that i can use? Thanks.


Video: 7
Audio: 6

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Hi. Can someone please tell me how to check if my movies are PAL or NTSC? Is there a program that i can use? Thanks.

---

__________________

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Pointless rls...

5/5/2

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

right click on the file while playing in media player, usually it'll tell you...

and they have these crazy "NFO" things now...

:::edit:::

yeah, i'm a moron, they diddn't say in the NFO

__________________
Am I the only one missing the .rar file from the repack?

Last edited by bryehn on 06-30-2003 at 10:10 PM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by ToughMan
Hi. Can someone please tell me how to check if my movies are PAL or NTSC? Is there a program that i can use? Thanks.


Video: 7
Audio: 6

---

__________________
You're only in as much trouble as you think you are.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Centropy's release is so awesome. Think ViM! THINK! Next stop: Screener/DVD Screener

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

decent job.

definitly wouldve been more positive things to say from some people above if you guys released it before CTP so keep up the good work. Hope to see some more titles by you guys

6/6/?

__________________
������������������
blazin.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

If someone can't play SVCD then they'll be much better off to take CTP's Hulk and re-encode to MPEG-1. This just seems silly to me is all.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Stop arguing.

This seems a bit of a backwards release, normally lower quality vcd and THEN svcd... not the other way around. Oh and with regards to the workprint being fine... it wasn't... it was horrible, picture ill-defined, something like a 5th or 6th generation copy with hideous tracking lines through it and VERY difficult to see in some dark segments.

ANyway, back to this release, it would be a fair release had the ctp not come before it, Vim seem a very promising group, keep up the good work, just with a bit more speed

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by ToughMan
I'm no bum kid! I have a decent job. Later kid.

---

sounds like a dude that says dawg all the time, son

__________________
Am I the only one missing the .rar file from the repack?

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

shitty movie, good release...
7/7/3

you gotta come provactive nigga! = Outkast...

::hello Swimj/Krad/Shibby/Shibber. Now, GOODBYE. -K::

Last edited by kalvaitis007 on 07-01-2003 at 04:54 AM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged