Picture: WS big "property of twdc" watermark almost looks like some kind of artificat strobing on the bottom.. also scrolling text below the pic,

Sound: Not the best, almost muffled soudning.

Think i'll stick with the telecine.

6/6/8

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

from sample: great video, audio ok (sounds one channel-ish)annoying "propery of" logo that i thought would disappear but came back after 5 seconds, so i would assume its in the whole film, and scrolling 800 number along bottom (in black bar region)

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

after viewing the sample there is a property of watermark and some scrolling text. decent rip, colors are just an okay screener. personally i can wait for the dvdrip since this doesn't satisfy me.

7/8/?

__________________
aj-

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by pjfan281
from sample: great video, great audio. annoying "propery of" logo that i thought would disappear but came back after 5 seconds, so i would assume its in the whole film, and scrolling 800 number along bottom (in black bar region)

---

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Yeah, this isn't that great...i mean it's got good video, the sound is just ok, but i think the telecine is a lot better (even though the subs are partially cut off on it)..and i didn't care for this movie, so i'll also stick w/ the telecine

7/6/4

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

But seriously, can someone confirm this? It's from a VHS tape and the sample is in widescreen - not cropped. Is the whole movie this way from the VHS source?

Think Tarantino is gonna make a widescreen VHS?

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

doesnt look good at all
stick with the telecine
6/6/8

__________________

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

i dont know why you guys are all wary of the vhs source, it's rare, but not completely unheard of widescreen vhs screeners. just look back when all those academy screeners came out.

anyways, the quality is ok, doesn't look like this is a 1st generation tape, probably copied a few times.

6/6/9.

but when i output it to my tv, its a bit better

6.5/6/9

__________________
"F*ck the RIAA!" - Some dumbass in the theatre, regarding the 'Dont pirate movies' commercial.

"The RIAA is music, you dumbass" - Me

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by Scorch
Sure we watched the same sample? Audio was shit on mine. Right channel was all like.. bleh

8/4/10

---

well you can see i had changed my comment after that typo

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quality


movie sux tho part one was pretty good but this was garbage!!!

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Thx for the awesome review jason.

Little below average screener pic. Sound is one channel. Movie was very disappointing.

6/3/4

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Yeah, audio was nasty in the right channel. I think it'd actually sound better if you mixed the right channel down to nothing and then split the left audio to both.

__________________


Scrobble all you want, we'll make more!

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

This is a fine example proving all that glitter isnt gold. Telecines are usually (aswell as in this case) of higher quality than VHS screeners, yet these screeners are higher ranked in the hierarchy of releases. Not worth the effort, HafVCD, but that just my opinion.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

think im going to stick with the telecine
just dont like all them watermarks
5/6/8 just my opion

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Eek... talk about a fuzzy picture. And does anyone else notice that the sound is slightly out-of-synch?

Oh, and the .cue files are wrong.

Video: 6
Audio: 5
Movie: 9

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Any particular reason why groups don't put the watermark/B&W switching information in their nfos? That can make or break a release for me.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by Jerry Aldini
Any particular reason why groups don't put the watermark/B&W switching information in their nfos? That can make or break a release for me.

---

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by NewbieSnipa
Wow.... that is getting really old, you've made that point about 50 times. If there are any b/w then the people will say in the reviews. Why is it so important, do you sell them or something?

---

I won't grab a release that has B&W switching because I find it distracting, and will hold off until a clean offering comes along. Thanks for setting me straight though

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

a divx rip went up of the whole 2nd movie about 3 days ago in a.b.divx

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

liked the movie, the audio needs some work, overall not bad
8/6/8

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged