VCDQuality Forums
Here you can view your subscribed threads, work with private messages and edit your profile and preferences Registration is free! Calendar Find other members Frequently Asked Questions Search Home  
VCDQuality Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.3.0 VCDQuality Forums > VCDQuality.com > Comments > DIVX > The Stepford Wives *XviD* - DVDRIP - DVL
  Last Thread   Next Thread
Author
Thread Post New Thread    Post A Reply
elamericano
Feb 2004

Member

looks good to me, 8/7
have not seen the movie so don't know how good it is in the content dept. Yah get rerip...........

Last edited by elamericano on 10-20-2004 at 05:35 PM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
Old Post 10-20-2004 03:20 PM
elamericano is offline Click Here to See the Profile for elamericano Click here to Send elamericano a Private Message Find more posts by elamericano Add elamericano to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
newcster68
Aug 2003


ExplorrentDotCom

Why was this nuked? I didnt see anything wrong with it.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
Old Post 10-20-2004 06:57 PM
newcster68 is offline Click Here to See the Profile for newcster68 Click here to Send newcster68 a Private Message Visit newcster68's homepage! Find more posts by newcster68 Add newcster68 to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Jassll
Jul 2004

Senior Member

What was wrong with this one that they had to have a rerip? Never seen a nuke reason

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
Old Post 10-20-2004 07:44 PM
Jassll is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Jassll Click here to Send Jassll a Private Message Visit Jassll's homepage! Find more posts by Jassll Add Jassll to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Subspsycho
Sep 2004

Newbie

If you compare the two NFO's you can see the resolution differs. I think the 640x3xx resolution of the initial rip was to big for the size of the release (1 CD 93 minutes). It's a good decision to decrease the resolution in order to improve the picture quality in this case.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
Old Post 10-20-2004 08:34 PM
Subspsycho is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Subspsycho Click here to Send Subspsycho a Private Message Find more posts by Subspsycho Add Subspsycho to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
ajj
Jul 2004

Junior Member

I guess bad AR was reason.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
Old Post 10-20-2004 10:04 PM
ajj is offline Click Here to See the Profile for ajj Click here to Send ajj a Private Message Find more posts by ajj Add ajj to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
SideBuster
Jun 2004

Junior Member

quote:
Originally posted by Subspsycho
If you compare the two NFO's you can see the resolution differs. I think the 640x3xx resolution of the initial rip was to big for the size of the release (1 CD 93 minutes). It's a good decision to decrease the resolution in order to improve the picture quality in this case.


If that was the case they should not have to change the ratio and that's what's happend in the rerip. First rip was a nice 16:9 ratio of the rerip is a a ratio unknown by me (16:8.64865).

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
Old Post 10-21-2004 12:15 AM
SideBuster is offline Click Here to See the Profile for SideBuster Click here to Send SideBuster a Private Message Find more posts by SideBuster Add SideBuster to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Subspsycho
Sep 2004

Newbie

quote:
Originally posted by ajj
I guess bad AR was reason.


You're right, I see now. The first rip had an A.R. of 1.74:1, the rerip has the proper A.R. of 1.85:1

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
Old Post 10-21-2004 07:34 AM
Subspsycho is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Subspsycho Click here to Send Subspsycho a Private Message Find more posts by Subspsycho Add Subspsycho to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Naugas
Jun 2004

Newbie

Is 1:1.85 the original AR, or is it it "forced" upon the releasegroups? I work as a projectionist, and I've seen quite a few 35 mm movies in 1:1.75. It's called American widescreen, and the 1:1.85 format is known as French widescreen.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
Old Post 10-21-2004 11:13 PM
Naugas is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Naugas Click here to Send Naugas a Private Message Find more posts by Naugas Add Naugas to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
ajj
Jul 2004

Junior Member

quote:
Originally posted by Naugas
Is 1:1.85 the original AR, or is it it "forced" upon the releasegroups? I work as a projectionist, and I've seen quite a few 35 mm movies in 1:1.75. It's called American widescreen, and the 1:1.85 format is known as French widescreen.


From Amazon.com:

Release Information:
Studio: Paramount Home Video
Theatrical Release Date: June 11, 2004
DVD Release Date: November 9, 2004
Run Time: 92 minutes
Production Company: Paramount Home VIdeo
Package Type: Keep Case

Aspect Ratio(s):
Widescreen anamorphic - 1.85:1

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
Old Post 10-23-2004 01:33 PM
ajj is offline Click Here to See the Profile for ajj Click here to Send ajj a Private Message Find more posts by ajj Add ajj to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:20 PM. Post New Thread    Post A Reply
  Last Thread   Next Thread
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread

Rate This Thread:

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts 		HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is OFF
 

< Contact Us - www.vcdquality.com >

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.