IMPORTANT, PLEASE READ

1 NO REQUESTING MOVIES OR SAMPLES (THIS INCLUDES REQUESTS FOR OTHER GROUPS TO RELEASE THIS MOVIE!)

2 DO NOT DISCUSS WHERE TO DOWNLOAD MOVIES OR SAMPLES

3 DO NOT ASK FOR "RAR PASSWORDS" COS WE DON'T KNOW THEM. CHECK WITH YOUR SOURCE

4 NO FLAMING

5 NO "SPOILERS"

6 NO SCENE-RELATED DISCUSSION/RUMORS (ESPECIALLY REGARDING BUSTS)

7 COMMENT ON THIS RELEASE ONLY (AND ONLY IF YOU'VE SEEN AT LEAST THE SAMPLE). THIS IS THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THE THREAD!

8 NO "NOOB" QUESTIONS SUCH AS "HOW DO I WATCH THIS?" ASK IN THE APPROPRIATE PART OF THE FORUM

9 NO DISCUSSING TRADING/SELLING. IF YOU SELL COPIES, GO AWAY YOU'RE NOT WELCOME HERE

* Newbie questions? Want some weird term clarifying? Read our FAQ

* General questions unrelated to this release? Internet LOL's? Right here dudes


*** PEOPLE IGNORING THE RULES WILL BE BANNED ***

Report this post to a moderator |

Wonderful about time a group released a PROPER release of this movie, and imo this movie is waaaay better than titanic.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by svcdhaq
and imo this movie is waaaay better than titanic.

---

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

Hmm, its a very small glitch, and ive already downed 9gb on this so far, and alot dont like much of this movie, so.......

Anyway, from sample and 2 random rars.

Video is same as last release, grainy, but nothing major.
Audio as before very nice.

9/9/?

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Real Proper hey....way too go sceney boppers...

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Same here, got this twice already, not worth getting again, but glad to see that someone is concerned about getting fixed what needed to be fixed.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Hope you're not paying by the gigabyte?

I have a nasty feeling the glitch is still there. The sample VOB they posted from CJ is not from the same place where it occured in FCR.

EDIT: Scrub that. I've just checked frame by frame and the disc is clean at the 80min, 39sec mark. More importantly, it doesn't lock-up on some players like the FCR transfer did. Never got around to checking CJ's before downloading this.

EDIT: As an aside, this new movie is considerably more grainy and less-sharp than the recently remastered "Dr No" which is over 40 years old but I don't suppose there is very much Emerald can do about that.

10/10/4

Last edited by ntscuser on 08-10-2006 at 11:11 PM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by svcdhaq
Wonderful about time a group released a PROPER release of this movie, and imo this movie is waaaay better than titanic.

---

Last edited by Air1 on 08-10-2006 at 03:59 AM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by Air1
Wrong.

As someone else said, it was the tiniest of glitches, something that even some dvd pressing batches have had in the years past.

This proper is completely unneeded. If you're seriously 'happy' to have a release with a couple of frames glitch-free then you got problems.

I'm a huge movie buff, and I download/burn my dvdr's in less than 1 hour total, but I can't think of maybe 2 DVD's in my entire collection that I'd re-encode or download just to fix a 1/4th-second glitch.

And btw, there's been a "proper" or two of this floating around by no-name groups in some places for days now, anyway...

---

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

The small glitch in the FCR release I didn't even notice haha.

But I always appreciate the proper and I agree it is needed.

But if you are happy with the FCR release don't bother.

__________________
---------------------------------------

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by pablo_escobar
Fuck That! A glitch is a glitch. Someone people (myself included) like movies that don’t fuck up. Yeah you can say oh well it’s just a little glitch and it’s no big deal. I appreciate this proper! Its shows quality control. Without some kind of quality control the whole dvdr scene would go to shit. So the point here is if you want a perfect release get this. It’s hard to believe a “huge movie buff” would accept a sub par release.

---

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by Air1
Maybe we should proper the 50+ dvdr releases in the last couple years that have a menu glitch (allowing you to highlite 'extras' when there are none, for example).

ROFL.. You're hilarious.

---

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by Air1
(allowing you to highlite 'extras' when there are none, for example)

---

That's not a glitch, that's just laziness...

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by Big
That's not a glitch, that's just laziness...

---

Some people consider it a glitch, but my point was that there are other equally imperfect 'errors' in an encode of a dvdr release that we don't proper, and that was just one simple example I gave. Obviously you didn't read the whole post I made.

The thing was, Mr. "pablo_escobar" said that his "point" was this proper is a "perfect release" and that the other release was "sub par" because of a 1/4th-second video hiccup. He was wrong, and I called him out on it.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

hey Air1,

What in the $@#$ do you use to download movies 4 gigs worht of video in one hour?

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged